Alex Manea 

Logging Life

archival pigment print on Hahnemuehle Photo Rag 308g

variable dimensions

2024

TEXT:

​

     In the 1930s, an alarming number of photographic negatives, captured by some of America's most celebrated photographers, met an untimely demise, a phenomenon now referred to as “killed negatives." This evocative term not only highlights the irreversibility of their loss but also underscores the brutal editorial process initiated under the leadership of Roy E. Stryker, who headed the Information Division of the Farm Security Administration (FSA). Stryker, who oversaw one of the most significant documentary photography efforts of the 20th century, wielded enormous control over what images would ultimately represent the American experience during the Great Depression.

​

     The FSA's documentary project, spanning from 1935 to 1944, aimed to capture the harrowing realities of rural life in Depression-era America. Legendary photographers like Walker Evans and Dorothea Lange were commissioned to create visual records that would inform and provoke change. While the resulting images have come to define an era, the lesser-known narrative is that of the countless photographs that never saw the light of day, casualties of Stryker's unforgiving selection process. Negatives that were deemed inadequate were not just set aside but were physically defaced with a hole punch, creating a stark reminder of what was lost, a trace of the complete image that once existed.

​

     This series is a contemplation of the legacy of these "killed negatives." Through an intensive exploration of the entire archive, I identified and selected approximately 250 defaced negatives. My goal has been to breathe new life into these damaged works, to recover the essence that was intended before their abrupt destruction. Through a meticulous and laborious process, I have digitally reconstructed the images, carefully removing the disfiguring black voids left by the hole punches. By restoring continuity within the images and seamlessly blending the fragmented areas, I attempt to reconstruct a visual narrative that was once forcibly erased.

​

     In doing so, this series delves into broader questions surrounding the nature of photographic curation and the power dynamics inherent in editorial processes, particularly during the analog era. In an age where countless images were discarded, often due to minute aesthetic decisions, we are confronted with the unsettling realization that selection criteria were frequently subjective, shaped by fleeting preferences or contextual considerations. These restored negatives raise important questions: Were the surviving images truly superior, or was their survival a product of arbitrary judgment? Many of the restored negatives have counterparts that were spared the hole punch, yet the boundary between what was preserved and what was destroyed remains ambiguous, governed more by subjective choice than by any objective measure of quality.

​

     This work is not just an act of restoration; it is a critical examination of the fragility of historical memory and the often invisible hand that shapes cultural narratives. Through these reconstructed images, we are invited to reconsider the stories that were never told, the perspectives that were silenced, and the profound implications of editorial decision-making in the visual documentation of history.